Not all AI use cases benefit from GenAI models. In some situations, traditional or specialized AI techniques outperform GenAI in terms of accuracy, reliability, cost, or explainability. Here are four common domains where caution is warranted:

1. Prediction and Forecasting
GenAI models are not designed for tasks like demand prediction or sales forecasting that require precise numerical analysis. While GenAI can support tasks such as feature creation, the core predictive modeling is better handled by traditional machine learning or statistical techniques.

2. Planning and Optimization
Complex optimization problems—like route planning, inventory allocation, or scheduling—require methods capable of solving mathematical constraints. These tasks demand exact solutions, which GenAI models are not equipped to provide in isolation.

3. Decision Intelligence
Critical decisions often require explainable and reliable outputs. GenAI’s occasional inaccuracies and opacity in reasoning make it risky for use in areas like budget planning, HR decisions, or strategic choices.

4. Autonomous Systems
GenAI lacks the reliability and real-time responsiveness required for autonomous systems such as self-driving cars or industrial robots. These applications typically demand deterministic behavior and robust fail-safes.

While generative AI brings exciting possibilities, it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. In domains that demand precision, transparency, and reliability, traditional AI and analytical methods remain essential.

At APGAR, we help organizations navigate these choices with clarity. Our experts combine deep knowledge of both classic and emerging AI techniques to design data strategies that are robust, efficient, and tailored to your real-world challenges. Whether you need to optimize operations, enhance decision-making, or unlock value from your data, we’ll help you apply the right tools — not just the trendiest ones.

Let’s make your data work smarter — and responsibly.

Would you like to get in touch with our experts?
If you agree, disagree or have something to add to these views on corporate strategy, please contact us.